FOLLOW THE MECHANISM

  1. 1Reference value

    Defines the intended unit of account.

  2. 2Backing or mechanism

    Supplies assets or incentives supporting the target.

  3. 3Issuance and redemption

    Changes token supply under stated conditions.

  4. 4Secondary market

    Trades at prices determined by actual orders and liquidity.

A conceptual sequence. Real implementations can add steps, intermediaries, and conditions.

The target is a design objective

Many stablecoins aim to trade near one unit of a national currency. USDC and USDT target dollars; EURC targets euros. The target is an intention, not an assurance that every trade occurs there. A euro token can maintain its euro peg while changing in dollar value. Gold-backed tokens such as PAXG represent a quantity of gold instead: their dollar value moves with gold. Always name the reference before calling an asset stable.

Circle · Circle Mint ↗Checked 14 Nov 2026Tether · Tether transparency ↗Checked 14 Nov 2026Circle · EURC ↗Checked 14 Nov 2026Paxos · PAX Gold ↗Checked 14 Nov 2026

Different mechanisms support the target

A fiat-backed issuer holds reserves and manages issuance and redemption. A crypto-collateralized design creates tokens against locked positions, with price feeds and liquidation rules. Synthetic designs can pair assets with offsetting derivatives; Ethena’s USDe uses a broader, changing backing portfolio. Algorithmic designs can rely heavily on supply adjustments involving another token. Real systems combine mechanisms. These categories describe how support is organized, not how safe an asset is or whether a quoted yield is sustainable.

Arbitrage needs a usable route

If eligible participants can buy a discounted token and reliably redeem it at the target, that trade can help pull the market price back toward the peg. It requires access, capital, operational capacity and confidence in settlement. A documented redemption right is not equivalent to every holder being able to redeem instantly. If the route stops working, the market price can remain far from the reference even while tokens keep transferring normally.

Losses can arrive through several layers

Reserves may lose value or become inaccessible; a custodian may fail; a contract may malfunction; an oracle may misprice collateral; or heavy redemptions may overwhelm available liquidity. A bridged version adds another obligation between the holder and the original stablecoin. Holding a stablecoin in a lending product then adds borrowing and platform risks. Stability of the quoted unit does not make every use of that unit equally safe.

MAKE IT CONCRETE

Three prices that can differ

Illustrative token: the target is 1 currency unit, estimated recoverable backing is 0.98 per token and a thin trading venue quotes 0.95. These numbers answer different questions. The first is an objective, the second is an asset/obligation estimate and the third is a market exchange rate. None can simply be substituted for the others.

FAILURE PATHS & COMMON MISREADINGS

Where the model can break

TRY IT YOURSELF

The stablecoin is trading at $0.96. What happened?

You hold 1,000 fictional dollar tokens and see a $0.96 quote. The same opening price can accompany inaccessible reserves, permanently missing assets, or a thin trading venue. Start with the case file. Open three pieces of evidence before deciding which problem the facts support, then test what the available routes actually do.

Open the scenario 3–5 min · Fictional balances · Replay your decisions

KEEP EXPLORING

Connect this idea

Make the distinction

Part of a bigger story

← Back to all topicsBack to top ↑